首页 > 论文导航 > 医学
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogra
 
更新日期:2021-04-22   来源: Cellular & Molecular Immunology   浏览次数:50   在线投稿
 

核心提示:BACKGROUND Abnormal liver function tests(LFTs) in post-liver transplant(LT) patients pose a challenge in the timing and

 

BACKGROUND Abnormal liver function tests(LFTs) in post-liver transplant(LT) patients pose a challenge in the timing and selection of diagnostic modalities.There are little data regarding the accuracy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) and liver biopsy(LB) in diagnosing post-transplant complications.AIM To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ERCP and LB in patients with nonvascular post-LT complications.METHODS This single-center retrospective study evaluated patients undergoing both ERCP and LB for evaluation of elevated LFTs within 6 mo of LT from 2000 to 2017.Diagnostic operating characteristics including accuracy,sensitivity and specificity for various diagnoses were calculated for ERCP and LB.The R factor(ratio of alkaline phosphatase to alanine aminotransferase) was also calculated for each patient.RESULTS Of the 1284 patients who underwent LT,91 patients(74.7% males,mean age of 51)were analyzed.Anastomotic strictures(AS,24.2 %),acute cellular rejection(ACR,11 %) and concurrent AS/ACR(14.3 %) were the most common diagnoses.ERCP carried an accuracy of 79.1%(95 % CI:69.3-86.9),LB had an accuracy of 93.4%(95 % CI:86.2-97.5),and the combination of the two had an accuracy of 100%(95 % CI:96-100).There was no difference between patients with AS and ACR in mean R factor(AS:1.9 vs ACR:1.1, P=0.24).Adverse events did not differ between the two tests(ERCP:3.1% vs LB:1.1%,P=0.31).ConCLUSION In patients with abnormal LFTs after LT without vascular complications,the combination of LB and ERCP carries low risk and improves diagnostic accuracy over either test alone.

 

上一篇:Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in l

下一篇: Towards Science Unification through Number

 
相关论文导读
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:99
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:65
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:63
 
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:58
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:68
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:93
 
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:62
 
 
发布日期:2022-05-26 来源: 浏览次数:72
 
分类浏览
 
论文阅读排行
 
最新论文阅读
 
 
 



2018-2020 400农业期刊网 专业学术期刊名单推荐平台

 

免责声明:本平台并非任何杂志官网,仅限于整理学术信息以及期刊投稿渠道